Talk:IBM Rochester

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parenthetical Remarks

There was an inordinate amount of commentary in parenthesis, which I attempted to reword in a decent manner. Please correct if you don't think it to be appropriate, but parenthetical remarks are hard to read. I have to fight the urge to keep down such remarks, myself, tending to insert excess factoids into otherwise useful information....

Also, HDD-related development is still being done at the IBM Rochester site by former the IBM STD resources divested to Hitachi GST. HGSTers from IBM don't like to forget their heritage. GMW 05:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

This article needs quite a bit of work to bring it up to date. A decade ago, this facility still had over five thousand employees. Now it shrunk by half as manufacturing is outsourced. Jonathunder (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

nickname

who nicknamed it the "big blue zoo". what source is there for this moniker? even if a few folks can be found, what constitutes a formal nickname? perhaps this is pure hogwash... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:100:6156:FBF9:0:0:0:1 (talk) 19:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Old comment, but I'm sure I've read it somewhere. I'll dig around for a ref. -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 06:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This should do. -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 06:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is pure hogwash. You can quote internet references all you want. But, having worked there for 30 years, it was not referred to in that way as a general thing. Some may have, but that doesn't make it a notable nickname. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.117.115.186 (talk) 09:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM Rochester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041228153812/http://www.nbm.org/blueprints/90s/winter90/page8/page8.htm to http://www.nbm.org/blueprints/90s/winter90/page8/page8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Site features

I removed the list of site features as it seemed unencyclopedic and borderline advertise-y. I'd be all for including certain site features elsewhere in the article, maybe even in a dedicated section, but not in list form. If anyone disagrees with this change, please let me know. -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 15:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

lopsided

There is no mention of manufacturing of unit record equipment. There is no mention of System/3 There is no mention of Systems 32, 34, 36, advanced 36 There is no mention of the 5100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.117.115.186 (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]